You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The calculation crashes on the step involving pw2z2pack.x with the following error:
Error in routine pw2z2pack (1):
lsym =/=0 not implemented with USP
This seems to be caused by the pseudopotential choice (note however that I am using PAW, not ultrasoft). The problem can be reproduced in the SnTe example, where if norm-conserving pseudopotentials are replaced by PAW, the calculation terminates with this error.
Is there a way around this error, aside from the use of norm-conserving pseudopotentials?
Regards,
Mihovil Bosnar
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not that I'm aware of, unfortunately. This is probably not a fundamental limitation, just that no one has taken the time to implement it in pw2z2pack.
note however that I am using PAW, not ultrasoft
If I'm not mistaken, the "ultrasoft" classifier in Quantum ESPRESSO's terminology includes both PAW and Vanderbilt PP. See e.g. the is_ultrasoft="true" statement in this PAW potential.
Not that I'm aware of, unfortunately. This is probably not a fundamental limitation, just that no one has taken the time to implement it in pw2z2pack.
Ok, thank you.
note however that I am using PAW, not ultrasoft
If I'm not mistaken, the "ultrasoft" classifier in Quantum ESPRESSO's terminology includes both PAW and Vanderbilt PP. See e.g. the is_ultrasoft="true" statement in this PAW potential.
I didn't know that, thank you. Indeed, all PAW setups that I use have this statement.
Dear z2pack developers, I am trying to calculate the mirror Chern number using the z2pack. I am using QuantumESPRESSO 5.3 and pw2z2pack.x program from here: https://github.com/Z2PackDev/Z2Pack/tree/master/2.1.x/examples/fp/pw2z2pack.
The calculation crashes on the step involving pw2z2pack.x with the following error:
This seems to be caused by the pseudopotential choice (note however that I am using PAW, not ultrasoft). The problem can be reproduced in the SnTe example, where if norm-conserving pseudopotentials are replaced by PAW, the calculation terminates with this error.
Is there a way around this error, aside from the use of norm-conserving pseudopotentials?
Regards,
Mihovil Bosnar
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: