Shadowsocks在延迟上已经打不过vless了吗？ #4063
Replies: 4 comments 17 replies
-
|
用ss就是因为它是加密的，保护用户的数据免受墙内运营商分析，你用vless不如用socks，反正都不加密，不加密的vless几乎就是明文，而且5-10ms对你影响很大吗 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
当我回到香港，我惊奇的发现 ss延迟竟然比vless高，5ms的差距已经磨平了深圳绕广州的路程了 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
另外我开了unified delay，去除掉了握手带来的额外延迟 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
或者说,我看到了个shadowsocks-rust看起来它的表现很不错 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
对称式加密的开销是极低的，尤其是基本的128位密钥，加上对速度要求高的数据基本是小包（512KB甚至更小），我认为没必要为了这0.5ms（甚至不到）的速度去牺牲安全性 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
socks几乎所有设备都是支持的 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
socks我记得比ss多个握手 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
所以说我在思考，ss是否已经落后，vless如果出个类似0-rtt的设计是否能代替掉ss成为新的中转协议选择 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
quic能过墙吗？ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
我能理解你在说什么,但是现在国内管udp管的紧，quic会q是一个，xhttpclash不支持又是一个 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
无论是中转还是出海，udp都有机会被q的 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
感觉还是不行的，短时间无法替代 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
可以，但是会被QoS，现在QUIC稳定可能是墙没加监测 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
你在截图中有什么样的程序？ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
rt,ss是aes128-gcm,vless是reality+xtls-rprx-vision,延迟如图：
isp为HKT，ss延迟普遍要比vless高5-10ping,那是不是代表哪怕做中转也要弃用ss,采用无加密vless呢？
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions