You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi!
What about add new obfuscation for mKCP transport? QUIC is a promising protocol that is being used more and more. But for the Xray QUIC transport, due to the multiplexing by design, the implementation of xtls-vision is difficult. At the same time, there is a good UDP protocol for which xtls-vision is implemented. It seems that obfuscating the mKCP as a QUIC is a good idea at the moment.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi!
What about add new obfuscation for mKCP transport? QUIC is a promising protocol that is being used more and more. But for the Xray QUIC transport, due to the multiplexing by design, the implementation of xtls-vision is difficult. At the same time, there is a good UDP protocol for which xtls-vision is implemented. It seems that obfuscating the mKCP as a QUIC is a good idea at the moment.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions