You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not even mentioning that 3.75m MPU cannot process all the resources extracted by single tiny MEU-100A at 5% resource site...
Just compare this: Single large MPU, 18 tons, producing 0.006 Metals per second
to this: 24 small MPUs, 16.9 tons (about 16.5 without adapters), producing 0.0062 Metals per second
Both IRL and in stock KSP larger smelters and/or chemical reactors are MORE efficient than arrays of small ones. In MKS it is somehow reverted...
BTW, Ranger Inflatable Workshop is insanely OP, making Tundra Mobiile Workshop and even Tundra Assembly Plant lag behind in terms of Material Kits or Machinery production. Anyway, how can visually smaller tent-like bubble host 25% more Machinery (2500) than dedicated 3.75m rigid part (2000)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not even mentioning that 3.75m MPU cannot process all the resources extracted by single tiny MEU-100A at 5% resource site...
Just compare this:
Single large MPU, 18 tons, producing 0.006 Metals per second
to this:
24 small MPUs, 16.9 tons (about 16.5 without adapters), producing 0.0062 Metals per second
Both IRL and in stock KSP larger smelters and/or chemical reactors are MORE efficient than arrays of small ones. In MKS it is somehow reverted...
BTW, Ranger Inflatable Workshop is insanely OP, making Tundra Mobiile Workshop and even Tundra Assembly Plant lag behind in terms of Material Kits or Machinery production. Anyway, how can visually smaller tent-like bubble host 25% more Machinery (2500) than dedicated 3.75m rigid part (2000)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: