The current workflow leads to a certain amount of catastrophic forgetting, the base model used abacaj/phi-2-super reach an average of $62.13$ on the open_llm_leaderboard while the resulting model Thytu/phi-2-audio-super falls to $35.79$.
| Model |
Average |
ARC |
HellaSwag |
MMLU |
TruthfulQA |
Winogrande |
GSM8K |
| abacaj/phi-2-super |
62.13 |
61.86 |
76.6 |
58.41 |
48.37 |
73.01 |
54.51 |
| Thytu/phi-2-audio-super |
35.79 |
33.96 |
43.17 |
28.67 |
50.91 |
58.01 |
0 |
While some kind of degradation is expected on a 2B parameters model, the resulting model shouldn't reach such a low average.
One interesting result is that when training the model on text-only data (meaning without training it to become multimodal) the Average still drops considerably
| Model |
Average |
ARC |
HellaSwag |
MMLU |
TruthfulQA |
Winogrande |
GSM8K |
| Multimodal |
35.79 |
33.96 |
43.17 |
28.67 |
50.91 |
58.01 |
0 |
| Text only |
35.36 |
35.92 |
45.33 |
24.58 |
46.21 |
59.98 |
0.15 |
This can either means:
- An issue in the training process, either regarding data processing or about the training itself
- The instruct data is made of a poor quality (unlikely)
The current workflow leads to a certain amount of catastrophic forgetting, the base model used abacaj/phi-2-super reach an average of$62.13$ on the open_llm_leaderboard while the resulting model Thytu/phi-2-audio-super falls to $35.79$ .
While some kind of degradation is expected on a 2B parameters model, the resulting model shouldn't reach such a low average.
One interesting result is that when training the model on text-only data (meaning without training it to become multimodal) the Average still drops considerably
This can either means: