Currently using the regex @"^<fun:(.+)@\d+>$" but this is too restrictive since
it doesn't capture managed lambda names which have dashes in the number part.
e.g. <fun:myFunc@966-1>.
Will either loosen regex like @"^<fun:(.+)@.+>$" or keep it tight but correct
like @"^<fun:(.+)@\d+(-\d+)?>$"
Original issue reported on code.google.com by stephen....@gmail.com on 15 Apr 2012 at 3:39