Skip to content

log likelihood #16

@lbq8942

Description

@lbq8942

i think your log likelihood is wrongly computed. i will state it from two aspects, first, you don't shift your sequence, we should use the first hidden to compute the second intensity, while you use the first hidden to compute the first intensity and you do it similarly when compute the integral term. Second, i wonder when you are doing monto carlo estimation, why do you execute the following code:
temp_time /= (time[:, :-1] + 1).unsqueeze(2)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions