diff --git a/.zenodo.json b/.zenodo.json
index 1a65e0d..3b51095 100644
--- a/.zenodo.json
+++ b/.zenodo.json
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
   "title": "The Minority Prophet Property: Copy-Invariant Evidence Aggregation in Rooted Claim Graphs",
   "upload_type": "publication",
   "publication_type": "preprint",
-  "publication_date": "2026-08-16",
-  "version": "1.1.0",
-  "description": "A peer-review candidate establishing conditional copy-invariance and root-margin sensitivity results for evidence aggregation over finite rooted claim graphs, with Lean-checked proofs and preregistered bounded validation.",
+  "publication_date": "2026-08-18",
+  "version": "1.2.0",
+  "description": "A peer-review candidate establishing conditional copy-invariance and root-margin sensitivity results for evidence aggregation over finite rooted claim graphs, with Lean-checked proofs and preregistered bounded validation. v1.2.0 adds one scope limitation: the aggregator answers a symmetric question and does not decide universal or existential claims. No result, proof, or validation number of v1.1.0 is retracted.",
   "creators": [
     {
       "name": "He, James Siyuan"
@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
     {
       "identifier": "https://github.com/Silentpartnercoding/minority-prophet",
       "relation": "isSupplementTo"
+    },
+    {
+      "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.21965713",
+      "relation": "isNewVersionOf",
+      "scheme": "doi"
     }
   ]
 }
diff --git a/output/pdf/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.pdf b/output/pdf/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.pdf
index 4675023..7e6e08c 100644
Binary files a/output/pdf/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.pdf and b/output/pdf/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.pdf differ
diff --git a/papers/peer-review/ARCHIVAL-INTEGRITY.md b/papers/peer-review/ARCHIVAL-INTEGRITY.md
index 40bf9dd..95e7476 100644
--- a/papers/peer-review/ARCHIVAL-INTEGRITY.md
+++ b/papers/peer-review/ARCHIVAL-INTEGRITY.md
@@ -44,7 +44,42 @@ File     minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.2.0.pdf
 DOI      not yet assigned; no v1.2.0 deposit exists
 ```
 
-## Open item for the owner: the tracked v1.1.0 PDF is not the deposited one
+## RESOLVED: the tracked v1.1.0 artifacts are now the deposited ones
+
+The v1.1.0 slot holds exactly what the v1.1.0 DOI resolves to. Both files were
+restored from their published state, and the restoration was **verified, not
+asserted**:
+
+```text
+manuscript   restored from tag paper-v1.1.0
+             sha256 bffb546cfc8375c94fd64017f567d1708adc3df8eaeff4bd669c6dabce056998
+PDF          downloaded from the Zenodo deposit
+             sha256 10413b41a2e87a527e2f01a29ed0cdfe17245a61eb0d9a6ce0bf334ca096d3da
+rebuild      building the restored manuscript on a different machine reproduces
+             the deposited PDF BYTE-FOR-BYTE, same sha256 10413b41...
+```
+
+That third line is the one that matters. It shows the restoration is correct,
+that the ReportLab build is deterministic across machines, and that the
+version-derived build change introduced with v1.2.0 does **not** disturb the
+reproduction of v1.1.0 — a hardcoded version string would have produced a
+different PDF here and the check would have failed.
+
+The DOI-bearing text that had drifted into the v1.1.0 slot now lives where it
+belongs, in **v1.2.0**. The previously recorded `bb948d25…` regeneration is
+superseded and is not tracked.
+
+### The problem this closes, kept visible
+
+> A reader of the repository's `v1.1.0` PDF was not reading the artifact the
+> `v1.1.0` DOI resolved to.
+
+The cause was benign and worth naming: the DOI was assigned *after* the artifact
+was frozen, and the natural repair — regenerate the PDF with the DOI in it — was
+applied to the version slot that must not change. The correct home for a
+post-publication correction is the next version, never the published one.
+
+## Superseded: open item for the owner (retained)
 
 The repository's tracked `output/pdf/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.pdf`
 hashes to `bb948d25…` — the DOI-bearing regeneration. The **Zenodo deposit**
diff --git a/papers/peer-review/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.md b/papers/peer-review/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.md
index 26b1e6b..5afcc88 100644
--- a/papers/peer-review/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.md
+++ b/papers/peer-review/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.md
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 **James Siyuan He**  
 Preprint v1.1.0; not peer reviewed, 16 August 2026
 Correspondence: https://github.com/Silentpartnercoding  
-Archival DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21965713
+Archival DOI: not yet assigned
 
 ## Abstract
 
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ In a finite binary rooted-claim graph, counting declared roots rather than claim
 
 ## Data and code availability
 
-All manuscript source, formal definitions and proofs, validation registrations, reference implementations, adverse findings, and result records are publicly available at https://github.com/Silentpartnercoding/minority-prophet. The reviewed source and PDF are fixed by the immutable `paper-v1.1.0` release tag. The archival preprint record, including the PDF and release archive, is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21965713.
+All manuscript source, formal definitions and proofs, validation registrations, reference implementations, adverse findings, and result records are publicly available at https://github.com/Silentpartnercoding/minority-prophet. The peer-review candidate is versioned in `papers/peer-review/`. An immutable release tag and archival DOI will be assigned only after maintainer approval of the candidate; the absence of an assigned DOI does not affect review of the repository record.
 
 ## Ethics statement