Commit c017c36
committed
Disallow pending cops
While we don't want to blindly enable all new cops, we should take a
stance on all cops, so our consumers don't have to.
Therefore, no cops should be marked as pending. When a Rubocop bump
introduces a new cop, we should triage it and either explicitly enable
or disable it.
If, for some reason, an update is required during a bad time for triage,
the updater should open an triage issue and mark the cop as disabled until it
is triaged.1 parent 446a2de commit c017c36
1 file changed
+22
-1
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
6 | 6 | | |
7 | 7 | | |
8 | 8 | | |
| 9 | + | |
| 10 | + | |
9 | 11 | | |
10 | 12 | | |
11 | 13 | | |
12 | 14 | | |
13 | 15 | | |
14 | | - | |
| 16 | + | |
15 | 17 | | |
16 | 18 | | |
17 | 19 | | |
| |||
70 | 72 | | |
71 | 73 | | |
72 | 74 | | |
| 75 | + | |
| 76 | + | |
| 77 | + | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + | |
| 82 | + | |
| 83 | + | |
| 84 | + | |
| 85 | + | |
| 86 | + | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
73 | 94 | | |
74 | 95 | | |
75 | 96 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments