You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am a bit confused regarding the PIDs and instruments.
As far as I understand, the PID for each instrument should point to somewhere like a publication describing the instrument. Or at least something that does not change over scicat instances.
For example in these two cases:
two catalogues with the same instruments would have different PIDs
When we set up a new instance all the pids would change, wouldn't they? On data loss etc.
Right now, when I create a new instrument over the REST API, the fields id, _id, and pid all contain the same value. That there is an internal id is obvious, but shouldn't the pid be controllable?
Is there a possibility of configuring it that I am missing, or am I misunderstanding that field entirely?
Thanks in advance!
cchndl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We don't use instruments at our facility, but looking over the schema it looks like uniqueName could be used to identify an instrument across multiple scicat instances.
id and _id are always the same and are the mongodb document identifier. For datasets the PID can be different (it is assignable by users in CREATE_DATASET_WITH_PID_GROUPS). It looks like we never had a request for custom instrument pids.
I am a bit confused regarding the PIDs and instruments.
As far as I understand, the PID for each instrument should point to somewhere like a publication describing the instrument. Or at least something that does not change over scicat instances.
For example in these two cases:
Right now, when I create a new instrument over the REST API, the fields id, _id, and pid all contain the same value. That there is an internal id is obvious, but shouldn't the pid be controllable?
Is there a possibility of configuring it that I am missing, or am I misunderstanding that field entirely?
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: