-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 139
Description
Great work! About why it works i have some ideas, but IDK if i am right, So here i am.
My perspective:
Thought: Why is it that even though SVF has fewer trainable parts, it is still more effective?
From the perspective of linear transformation, among the three matrices derived from Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), the most crucial one is the middle matrix. The first and third matrices are essentially just rotations in the linear transformation. The diagonal matrix in the middle actually determines the scaling of weights across various dimensions. SVF can directly alter min(m,n) dimensions.
Secondly, during LoRA fine-tuning, it appears that there are (m+n)*r' parameters. However, if these two matrices are also subjected to SVD, in reality, when adjusting the most critical scaling dimensions, only r'+r' dimensions are actually available for use.
THX so much.