Skip to content

Not a bug, but some questions. #3

@Kevin-naticl

Description

@Kevin-naticl

Great work! About why it works i have some ideas, but IDK if i am right, So here i am.
My perspective:

Thought: Why is it that even though SVF has fewer trainable parts, it is still more effective?

From the perspective of linear transformation, among the three matrices derived from Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), the most crucial one is the middle matrix. The first and third matrices are essentially just rotations in the linear transformation. The diagonal matrix in the middle actually determines the scaling of weights across various dimensions. SVF can directly alter min(m,n) dimensions.

Secondly, during LoRA fine-tuning, it appears that there are (m+n)*r' parameters. However, if these two matrices are also subjected to SVD, in reality, when adjusting the most critical scaling dimensions, only r'+r' dimensions are actually available for use.

THX so much.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions