You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’ve encountered an issue while using Proxmark3 to simulate a MIFARE Classic (M1) card on a specific reader. The simulated card does not work correctly with the reader, while the actual card works fine. Below, I have provided the logs for both the simulated card and the real card communication with the reader.
Start | End | Src | Data (! denotes parity error) | CRC | Annotation
------------+------------+-----+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----+--------------------
0 | 2368 | Tag |04 00 | |
2317532 | 2317884 | Rdr |02(2) | |
2319776 | 2322144 | Tag |04 00 | |
2568956 | 2571420 | Rdr |93 20 | | ANTICOLL
2572592 | 2578480 | Tag |43 6E CF 52 B0 | |
2833676 | 2844140 | Rdr |93 70 43 6E CF 52 B0 45 27 | ok | SELECT_UID
2845376 | 2848896 | Tag |08 B6 DD | ok |
3332156 | 3336860 | Rdr |60 27 48 2E | ok | AUTH-A(39)
3338480 | 3343216 | Tag |EE FE 7F 01 | | AUTH: nt
3558748 | 3568124 | Rdr |73 B2 43 96! 33 79! 4D 21! | | AUTH: nr ar (enc)
3569296 | 3574032 | Tag |a4! E8 71! 05! | | AUTH: at (enc)
3802364 | 3807132 | Rdr |25 AB a9! A4 | |
| | * | key 013F0E139C0A prng WEAK | |
| | * |30 24 24 CF | ok | READBLOCK(36)
3808304 | 3829168 | Tag |28! cf! a6! 23 61 58! E3 57 6F 6D 61! 06! EC 9D 9b! 97! 20 EF | |
| | * |01 0B B8 08 BB B3 B0 03 4C 4C FB E9 FE EB E0 F0 3E C9 | ok |
5969996 | 5971052 | Rdr |26(7) | | REQA
5972240 | 5974608 | Tag |04 00 | |
6223324 | 6223548 | Rdr |01(1) | |
6226976 | 6232864 | Tag |43 6E CF 52 B0 | |
6501680 | 6505200 | Tag |08 B6 DD | ok |
8074032 | 8076400 | Tag |04 00 | |
8325132 | 8327596 | Rdr |93 20 | | ANTICOLL
8328784 | 8334672 | Tag |43 6E CF 52 B0 | |
8591260 | 8601724 | Rdr |93 70 43 6E CF 52 B0 45 27 | ok | SELECT_UID
8602960 | 8606480 | Tag |08 B6 DD | ok |
10416892 | 10417948 | Rdr |26(7) | | REQA
10419136 | 10421504 | Tag |04 00 | |
10670220 | 10670444 | Rdr |01(1) | |
10673872 | 10679760 | Tag |43 6E CF 52 B0 | |
10936620 | 10947084 | Rdr |93 70 43 6E CF 52 B0 45 27 | ok | SELECT_UID
10948320 | 10951840 | Tag |08 B6 DD | ok |
Problem Summary:
One key difference is the response to the 02 command. The real card responds with 04 00, whereas the simulated card responds with 02 00 00 AC 10. This discrepancy might be related to the simulated card failing on the reader, but I'm not entirely certain if this is the root cause.
Details:
Firmware: Latest version of Proxmark3 (v4.18589)
Hardware: Radiowar Black Edition
Could you please help me understand why this discrepancy occurs and how I can configure Proxmark3 to simulate the card correctly? Any guidance or suggestions for further troubleshooting steps would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time and support!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Recently, I used a Chameleon to emulate the same card, and it worked perfectly with this reader. It seems like a compatibility issue between the Proxmark3 emulated card and this specific reader. Any suggestions?
I’ve encountered an issue while using Proxmark3 to simulate a MIFARE Classic (M1) card on a specific reader. The simulated card does not work correctly with the reader, while the actual card works fine. Below, I have provided the logs for both the simulated card and the real card communication with the reader.
Simulated Card Communication Log:
Real Card Communication Log:
Problem Summary:
One key difference is the response to the
02
command. The real card responds with04 00
, whereas the simulated card responds with02 00 00 AC 10
. This discrepancy might be related to the simulated card failing on the reader, but I'm not entirely certain if this is the root cause.Details:
Could you please help me understand why this discrepancy occurs and how I can configure Proxmark3 to simulate the card correctly? Any guidance or suggestions for further troubleshooting steps would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time and support!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: