We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It's possible to define schemas of type object that contain the items field and vice versa. Such schemas don't make sense.
items
Describe the solution you'd like
We need to add one more built-in rule that shows a warning for this case.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Doing nothing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
these rules already exist thanks to Adam.
Redocly/redocly-cli-cookbook#33
Sorry, something went wrong.
@jeremyfiel yes, but we can do that better with a built-in rule. I expect to add more cases to this rule later on.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It's possible to define schemas of type object that contain the
items
field and vice versa. Such schemas don't make sense.Describe the solution you'd like
We need to add one more built-in rule that shows a warning for this case.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Doing nothing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: