You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If anyone wishes to replace the code in this project with files that retain commit history, go ahead and make the changes.
Over the coming weeks the build and release process will be updated.
This project does not need to release immediately as 1.0. It can continue with 0.x releases until it makes sense to hit 1.0. Its lifecycle is now decoupled from RxJava.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This project -if I am correct- has been created and is being updated based on the RxJava one with copy/pastes.
There is still 40% of code in Java. Just asking if it would it make any sense (see benefits) to replace the java code with groovy one. And of course other than the consistency one.
RxGroovy has been extracted from RxJava prior to 1.0 as per ReactiveX/RxJava#589
I have done this with a simply copy/paste/commit for now. Commit history remains in the 0.20.x branch of RxJava: https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava/tree/0.20.x
If anyone wishes to replace the code in this project with files that retain commit history, go ahead and make the changes.
Over the coming weeks the build and release process will be updated.
This project does not need to release immediately as 1.0. It can continue with 0.x releases until it makes sense to hit 1.0. Its lifecycle is now decoupled from RxJava.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: