Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RxGroovy Bootstrap #1

Open
benjchristensen opened this issue Aug 19, 2014 · 3 comments
Open

RxGroovy Bootstrap #1

benjchristensen opened this issue Aug 19, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

RxGroovy has been extracted from RxJava prior to 1.0 as per ReactiveX/RxJava#589

I have done this with a simply copy/paste/commit for now. Commit history remains in the 0.20.x branch of RxJava: https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava/tree/0.20.x

If anyone wishes to replace the code in this project with files that retain commit history, go ahead and make the changes.

Over the coming weeks the build and release process will be updated.

This project does not need to release immediately as 1.0. It can continue with 0.x releases until it makes sense to hit 1.0. Its lifecycle is now decoupled from RxJava.

@Diolor
Copy link

Diolor commented Mar 20, 2015

Any benefits on replacing the java code with groovy one - e.g. compilation time?

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member Author

I don't understand your question. Can you elaborate please?

@Diolor
Copy link

Diolor commented Mar 21, 2015

This project -if I am correct- has been created and is being updated based on the RxJava one with copy/pastes.
There is still 40% of code in Java. Just asking if it would it make any sense (see benefits) to replace the java code with groovy one. And of course other than the consistency one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants