Add global protocol configuration module

[El-swaggerito]

Description

Difficulty: Expert

Type: Feature

Summary

Implement or document global protocol configuration module for the Aegis Contracts with typed behaviour, clear edge cases, tests, and contributor-ready documentation.

Current Behaviour

The Contracts may not yet have a complete, reusable, and well-tested implementation for global protocol configuration module, which can create duplicated logic or unclear contributor expectations.

Expected Behaviour

The repository should provide a clear global protocol configuration module workflow that is safe for RWA/compliance use cases and consistent with the SDK, dashboard, and contract boundaries.

Suggested Implementation

Design the data model, add the implementation or documentation, connect it to relevant Aegis modules, add fixtures or tests, and update README/docs where applicable.

Files or Areas Likely Affected

• src/
• contracts/
• tests/
• docs/
• README.md
• Makefile

Acceptance Criteria

• Global protocol configuration module is implemented or clearly specified.
• Relevant edge cases and failure states are handled.
• Security and compliance-sensitive assumptions are documented.
• Tests, fixtures, or review checklists are added where practical.
• README or docs link to the new guidance.
• The change is compatible with the rest of the Aegis ecosystem.

Additional Notes

Keep wording precise: protocol-level compliance should not be presented as legal or financial advice.

[NovusCyber]

I would love to take on this Expert-level issue. I understand that a global protocol configuration module for RWA contexts requires airtight access control, strict type safety, and crystal-clear operational boundaries to remain secure and compliant without overstepping into legal advice.

Here is my execution plan:

Architecture & Typed Behavior: I will design and implement the global configuration state (e.g., handling protocol parameters, roles, or pause states) with strict typing to prevent malformed updates. I will ensure access control boundaries are explicitly defined and enforced.

RWA Guardrails & Edge Cases: I will map out and handle critical failure states (e.g., preventing configuration updates that could lock assets or brick the protocol). I will document all security and compliance-sensitive assumptions rigorously, keeping the language purely technical and architectural.

Testing & Ecosystem Alignment: I will build comprehensive tests and fixtures covering valid state transitions and edge cases. I will also ensure the configuration data model perfectly aligns with the expectations of the SDK and dashboard boundaries.

Deliverables:
A fully implemented and tested global configuration module (src/, contracts/, tests/), alongside contributor-ready documentation (docs/, README.md) that explicitly specifies the workflow, security assumptions, and edge cases.

Ready to dive in if assigned.

[grantfox-oss]

🦊 GrantFox — @NovusCyber has been assigned to this issue as part of the Official Campaign | FWC26 campaign!

Next steps:

1. Open a Pull Request referencing this issue (e.g., Closes #35)
2. Your PR will be reviewed by the Axionvera maintainers

Good luck! Track your progress on GrantFox.

[El-swaggerito]

Assigned to @NovusCyber. Please follow the acceptance criteria and submit a clean PR linked to this issue.