We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It looks like s3fs has issues with S3 and the latest pyfilesystem2? Maybe it's the prefix?
>>> from fs_s3fs import S3FS >>> fs = S3FS('my-bucket', aws_access_key_id="XXX", aws_secret_access_key="YYY") >>> fs.tree() └── 89cf0ccb-a492-4495-9022-e53dc2ed1461 └── error (resource '/89cf0ccb-a492-4495-9022-e53dc2ed1461' not found)
>>> import boto3 >>> s3 = boto3.resource('s3', aws_access_key_id="XXX", aws_secret_access_key="YYY") >>> my_bucket = s3.Bucket('my-bucket') >>> list(my_bucket.objects.all()) [s3.ObjectSummary(bucket_name='my-bucket' key='89cf0ccb-a492-4495-9022-e53dc2ed1461/about.md'), s3.ObjectSummary(bucket_name='my-bucket', key='89cf0ccb-a492-4495-9022-e53dc2ed1461/data.h5ad'), s3.ObjectSummary(bucket_name='my-bucket', key='89cf0ccb-a492-4495-9022-e53dc2ed1461/markers.csv')]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It looks like s3fs has issues with S3 and the latest pyfilesystem2? Maybe it's the prefix?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: