-
Hi all, please I read the documentation but I can't answer myself correctly. 👽
Thanks for the insights and sorry for the stupid questions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
Yes, because each cache relieves the load on the Recursor and dnsdist processes and thus the CPUs.
The record-cache is very valuable, even if it only has a few hits (the packet cache catches a lot). Every record-cache miss leads to expensive processing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@paddg thank you Should I try experimenting with different values like maxTTL / minTTL or are the default values ideal?
https://dnsdist.org/guides/cache.html and recursor (Does that make sense?):
And last question. 😃
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@paddg Thank you for your time. I will try more variations to see which one is best for me. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
In general, the default values are always a good choice, you should only change them if you know exactly what you are doing and the new values are confirmed by tests.
Limiting
maxTTL
is a good idea. This protects you from mistakes made by third parties.minTTL=0
is default, caching records with a short lifespan doesn't do much good, but it doesn't really do any harm either.temporaryFailureTTL
relieves the processes, you have to weigh up the pros and …