Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bulk import from info provider #869

Open
riacob opened this issue Feb 23, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Bulk import from info provider #869

riacob opened this issue Feb 23, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@riacob
Copy link

riacob commented Feb 23, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to transfer 170+ parts from an excel sheet to parts-db.
Importing it with the normal import functionality, regardless if the spn# is present or not, does not automatically consider the import to be "from info provider", thus requiring manual copy, paste, and stock setting for every single part.

Describe the solution you'd like
An extra import option, be it a separate menu item or a checkmark, to import CSV files containing spn#, stock, and category, and automatically fetching data for each of them from the selected info provider.

Describe alternatives you've considered
/

Additional context
In my particular situation, i need to move from a google sheet, which has all my parts in it, to parts-db.
And, in the future, be able to seamlessly import order history from LCSC to part-db, as I'm currently manually copying the mpn# into the google sheet, then using IMPORTXML magic to fetch the data, which is very inefficient.

@riacob riacob added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 23, 2025
@riacob
Copy link
Author

riacob commented Feb 23, 2025

Proposed solution is a for loop calling the import from info provider function with the mpn# as param, then setting category and stock from csv, and fetching the data. Repeating this n times.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant