You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we don't properly document how we define electric dipole / quadrupole matrix elements and how scattering rates / Rabi frequencies should be calculated from them.
This has been discussed in a few places, opening a single issue here to track the discussion:
One thing to think about here is what level of documentation we want. My aim is explicitly not to write a text book on atomic physics; just to have enough documentation for the conventions / definitions to be clear to someone with a good understanding of (text book on) atomic physics.
In particular, I want to avoid the kind of explanations that one often finds in atomic physics which go "detail...detail...detail...wave hands...detail...detail". I don't think that is a useful thing for us to have. As such, I think we probably just need a much condensed version of #10 , which summarizes the results, but without as much of the workings.
NB there are a few FIXMEs which have crept in in places where I think we're doing something slightly odd in our electric multipole calculations. We should resolve these while tidying up the docs here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently we don't properly document how we define electric dipole / quadrupole matrix elements and how scattering rates / Rabi frequencies should be calculated from them.
This has been discussed in a few places, opening a single issue here to track the discussion:
One thing to think about here is what level of documentation we want. My aim is explicitly not to write a text book on atomic physics; just to have enough documentation for the conventions / definitions to be clear to someone with a good understanding of (text book on) atomic physics.
In particular, I want to avoid the kind of explanations that one often finds in atomic physics which go "detail...detail...detail...wave hands...detail...detail". I don't think that is a useful thing for us to have. As such, I think we probably just need a much condensed version of #10 , which summarizes the results, but without as much of the workings.
NB there are a few FIXMEs which have crept in in places where I think we're doing something slightly odd in our electric multipole calculations. We should resolve these while tidying up the docs here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: