We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Does the 96-Channel pipette accept flow_rate adjustment parameters? I have tested various rates and they all perform at the same rate.
tiprack_with_adapters1 = protocol.load_labware("opentrons_flex_96_tiprack_1000ul", "A1", adapter="opentrons_flex_96_tiprack_adapter", label="Tips with Adapters A1") tipracks = [tiprack_with_adapters1] flex96 = protocol.load_instrument("flex_96channel_1000", "left", tip_racks=tipracks) flex96.pick_up_tip(tiprack_with_adapters1.wells()[0]) flex96.flow_rate.aspirate = 1000 flex96.flow_rate.dispense = 1800 flex96.aspirate(200, wash_plate_1["A1"].bottom(z=2)) flex96.dispense(200, wash_plate_1["A1"].bottom(z=2),rate=10) flex96.aspirate(200, wash_plate_1["A1"].bottom(z=2)) flex96.dispense(200, wash_plate_1["A1"].bottom(z=2),rate=40) flex96.aspirate(200, wash_plate_1["A1"].bottom(z=2)) flex96.dispense(200, wash_plate_1["A1"].bottom(z=2)) flex96.mix(5,100, wash_plate_1["A1"].bottom(z=2),rate=10)
The flow rate remains set to the default and is unaffected by these parameters.
The flow rate should change.
Windows
requirements = { "robotType": "Flex", "apiLevel": "2.18" }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Overview
Does the 96-Channel pipette accept flow_rate adjustment parameters? I have tested various rates and they all perform at the same rate.
Steps to reproduce
Current behavior
The flow rate remains set to the default and is unaffected by these parameters.
Expected behavior
The flow rate should change.
Operating system
Windows
System and robot setup or anything else?
requirements = {
"robotType": "Flex",
"apiLevel": "2.18"
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: