What happened?
The recent CO2 emission-driven simulation still use prescribed CO2 concentrations in the radiation calculation. This was the case for the simulations :
- nHISTesm.ne16pg3_tn14.noresm3_0_beta03b.2025-11-04
- nhistesm.ne16pg3_tn14.noresm3_0_beta19.Base_i446F.Olivia.2026-06-09
- n1850esm.ne16pg3_tn14.pr-noresm3_0_beta19.Base_i446F.Olivia.2026-06-07
The first one can be found on Betzy in the directory :
/cluster/projects/nn9560k/tjiputra/NorESM/NorESM3_dev_cases/nHISTesm.ne16pg3_tn14.noresm3_0_beta03b.2025-11-04
The last two can both be found on Olivia in the directories :
/cluster/projects/nn9560k/adagj/NorESM/cases-noresm3dev/nhistesm.ne16pg3_tn14.noresm3_0_beta19.Base_i446F.Olivia.2026-06-09
/cluster/projects/nn9560k/adagj/NorESM/cases-noresm3dev/n1850esm.ne16pg3_tn14.pr-noresm3_0_beta19.Base_i446F.Olivia.2026-06-07
Prescribed CO2 concentrations are still read by the model (this is in principle not a problem). This can be seen in atm_in :
flbc_list = 'CO2','CH4','N2O','CFC11','CFC12','CFC11eq'
The problem is that these prescribed CO2 concentrations are used in the radiation calculation. This can be seen in atm_in :
rad_climate = 'A:Q:H2O', 'N:O2:O2', 'N:CO2:CO2', 'N:ozone:O3', 'N:N2O:N2O', 'N:CH4:CH4', 'N:CFC11:CFC11', 'N:CFC12:CFC12'
N means that prescribed values are used, A means that a 3D field is used. This should have contained instead :
What are the steps to reproduce the bug?
See the 3 experiments mentioned above. The corresponding simulation issue numbers are 266, 453 and 451.
What CAM-Nor tag were you using?
noresm3_0_039_cam6_4_121
What machine were you running CAM (or NorESM) on?
Olivia
What compiler were you using?
Intel
Path to a case directory, if applicable
The first one can be found on Betzy in the directory : - /cluster/projects/nn9560k/tjiputra/NorESM/NorESM3_dev_cases/nHISTesm.ne16pg3_tn14.noresm3_0_beta03b.2025-11-04 The last two can both be found on Olivia in the directories : - /cluster/projects/nn9560k/adagj/NorESM/cases-noresm3dev/nhistesm.ne16pg3_tn14.noresm3_0_beta19.Base_i446F.Olivia.2026-06-09 - /cluster/projects/nn9560k/adagj/NorESM/cases-noresm3dev/n1850esm.ne16pg3_tn14.pr-noresm3_0_beta19.Base_i446F.Olivia.2026-06-07
Will you be addressing this bug yourself?
No
Extra info
I intend to run two short simulations where I output the CO2 concentration seen by the radiation code (m_CO2_c and cb_CO2_c variables). That should confirm which CO2 field (the prescribed or the interactively calculated one) is taken into account for the radiation calculation.
What happened?
The recent CO2 emission-driven simulation still use prescribed CO2 concentrations in the radiation calculation. This was the case for the simulations :
The first one can be found on Betzy in the directory :
/cluster/projects/nn9560k/tjiputra/NorESM/NorESM3_dev_cases/nHISTesm.ne16pg3_tn14.noresm3_0_beta03b.2025-11-04The last two can both be found on Olivia in the directories :
/cluster/projects/nn9560k/adagj/NorESM/cases-noresm3dev/nhistesm.ne16pg3_tn14.noresm3_0_beta19.Base_i446F.Olivia.2026-06-09/cluster/projects/nn9560k/adagj/NorESM/cases-noresm3dev/n1850esm.ne16pg3_tn14.pr-noresm3_0_beta19.Base_i446F.Olivia.2026-06-07Prescribed CO2 concentrations are still read by the model (this is in principle not a problem). This can be seen in atm_in :
The problem is that these prescribed CO2 concentrations are used in the radiation calculation. This can be seen in atm_in :
Nmeans that prescribed values are used,Ameans that a 3D field is used. This should have contained instead :What are the steps to reproduce the bug?
See the 3 experiments mentioned above. The corresponding simulation issue numbers are 266, 453 and 451.
What CAM-Nor tag were you using?
noresm3_0_039_cam6_4_121
What machine were you running CAM (or NorESM) on?
Olivia
What compiler were you using?
Intel
Path to a case directory, if applicable
The first one can be found on Betzy in the directory : -
/cluster/projects/nn9560k/tjiputra/NorESM/NorESM3_dev_cases/nHISTesm.ne16pg3_tn14.noresm3_0_beta03b.2025-11-04The last two can both be found on Olivia in the directories : -/cluster/projects/nn9560k/adagj/NorESM/cases-noresm3dev/nhistesm.ne16pg3_tn14.noresm3_0_beta19.Base_i446F.Olivia.2026-06-09-/cluster/projects/nn9560k/adagj/NorESM/cases-noresm3dev/n1850esm.ne16pg3_tn14.pr-noresm3_0_beta19.Base_i446F.Olivia.2026-06-07Will you be addressing this bug yourself?
No
Extra info
I intend to run two short simulations where I output the CO2 concentration seen by the radiation code (m_CO2_c and cb_CO2_c variables). That should confirm which CO2 field (the prescribed or the interactively calculated one) is taken into account for the radiation calculation.