You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the primary Forge repo, we're using fuzzy patching (triggered by the Pupdating flag) to help automate the resolution of most patches to a changed and shifted file.
It works by finding the closest context match (the surrounding area around a patch hunk) if there is no exact match to target. If there is no "close" match, the patch goes to a rejects folder for manual resolution by a human operator.
This would help greatly in MCPConfig, perhaps with a lower threshold for failed applications so that common fuzzy patching issues (such as duplicated lines) are less likely to happen.
Switching to fuzzy patching, combined with incremental patches (described in another issue) will mean that the 1.19-pre1 to 1.19-rc2 update would have roughly 3 files rather than roughly 60.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So, we're thinking about snapshots.
In the primary Forge repo, we're using fuzzy patching (triggered by the Pupdating flag) to help automate the resolution of most patches to a changed and shifted file.
It works by finding the closest context match (the surrounding area around a patch hunk) if there is no exact match to target. If there is no "close" match, the patch goes to a rejects folder for manual resolution by a human operator.
This would help greatly in MCPConfig, perhaps with a lower threshold for failed applications so that common fuzzy patching issues (such as duplicated lines) are less likely to happen.
Switching to fuzzy patching, combined with incremental patches (described in another issue) will mean that the 1.19-pre1 to 1.19-rc2 update would have roughly 3 files rather than roughly 60.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: