Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Isn't the model sensor-independent? #20

Open
study-never-alone opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Isn't the model sensor-independent? #20

study-never-alone opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@study-never-alone
Copy link

Hi:
Thanks for this great work. In the paper you said: Since our proposed denoising network needs to be trained for specific sensors. So, we need train sifferent model for different sensor?
But, in my opinion. Eqn. (10) indicates that the model can be used for any sensor after k-Sigma Transform
image

@bigeagle
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, we can use k-sigma transform to use the same model for multiple sensors.
But the distribution of k, sigma, or the noise profile, are still "defined" by the training data, i.e. the model cannot generalize to untrained noise profiles. So we cannot claim that this method is sensor-independent.

@study-never-alone
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your reply.
What do you mean by noise profile? I think the final noise model is only related to f(x*). Can I have a contact information from you, if it's convenient, so that I can consult you in more detail?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants