Skip to content

SRS Doc #28

@GRudolph

Description

@GRudolph

Good - Collaborative process evident with some gaps

  • ✅ Collaborative process followed (individual SRS documents merged)
  • ✅ Individual contributions evident in final SRS
  • ✅ Requirements are clear and mostly complete
  • ⚠️ Missing detailed specifications for some areas like performance, security, error handling
  • ⚠️ No traceability between requirements and implementation

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions