|
| 1 | +# Context-Dependent Requirements in smite |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## The Problem |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Many SMF (SingleMoleculeFitting) fields are documented as "optional" with default values (often `[]`), but are actually **required in specific contexts**. This leads to: |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +1. **Confusing errors** - Missing required field causes cryptic downstream error |
| 8 | +2. **Documentation ambiguity** - "Optional" doesn't tell full story |
| 9 | +3. **User frustration** - Code works in one context, fails in another |
| 10 | +4. **Testing gaps** - Field never tested in context where it's required |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +## Examples of Context-Dependent Fields |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +### 1. SMF.Data.DataROI |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +**Documented as:** |
| 17 | +```matlab |
| 18 | +SMF.Data.DataROI = []; % Optional, default [] |
| 19 | +``` |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +**Reality:** |
| 22 | +- **Optional** when loading from files (gets size from data) |
| 23 | +- **REQUIRED** when calling `gaussBlobImage()` (needs output dimensions) |
| 24 | +- **Optional** for most analysis workflows |
| 25 | +- **Required** for image generation workflows |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +**Better documentation:** |
| 28 | +```matlab |
| 29 | +SMF.Data.DataROI = [YStart, XStart, YEnd, XEnd]; |
| 30 | +% [1, 1, 128, 128] for full 128x128 image |
| 31 | +% |
| 32 | +% REQUIRED for: |
| 33 | +% - smi_sim.GaussBlobs.gaussBlobImage() - defines output size |
| 34 | +% - Image generation from SMD |
| 35 | +% |
| 36 | +% OPTIONAL for: |
| 37 | +% - File-based analysis (loaded from data) |
| 38 | +% - LocalizeData workflows (gets from image stack) |
| 39 | +% |
| 40 | +% If omitted when required: Causes index error in image generation |
| 41 | +``` |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +**Detection in code:** |
| 44 | +```matlab |
| 45 | +% WRONG - will fail |
| 46 | +SMF = smi_core.SingleMoleculeFitting(); |
| 47 | +[~, img] = smi_sim.GaussBlobs.gaussBlobImage(SMD, SMF); % ERROR! |
| 48 | +
|
| 49 | +% RIGHT - includes required context |
| 50 | +SMF = smi_core.SingleMoleculeFitting(); |
| 51 | +SMF.Data.DataROI = [1, 1, 128, 128]; % Required for this operation |
| 52 | +[~, img] = smi_sim.GaussBlobs.gaussBlobImage(SMD, SMF); % Works! |
| 53 | +``` |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +### 2. SMF.Data.CameraGain |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +**Documented as:** |
| 58 | +```matlab |
| 59 | +SMF.Data.CameraGain = 1; % Default 1 |
| 60 | +``` |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +**Reality:** |
| 63 | +- **Acceptable default** for simulated data (unit gain) |
| 64 | +- **Must match calibration** for real camera data |
| 65 | +- **Critical** for photon number accuracy |
| 66 | +- **Less critical** for position-only analysis |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +**Better documentation:** |
| 69 | +```matlab |
| 70 | +SMF.Data.CameraGain = 1; % electrons/ADU |
| 71 | +% |
| 72 | +% Simulated data: Use 1 (default) |
| 73 | +% Real sCMOS: Load from calibration file (typical: 0.5-5) |
| 74 | +% Real EMCCD: Set to EM gain value (typical: 50-300) |
| 75 | +% |
| 76 | +% Impact if incorrect: |
| 77 | +% - Photon numbers wrong (affects SNR, precision estimates) |
| 78 | +% - Positions usually OK (gain cancels in ratio) |
| 79 | +% - Thresholding may fail (wrong photon-based thresholds) |
| 80 | +``` |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +### 3. SMF.Data.PixelSize |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +**Documented as:** |
| 85 | +```matlab |
| 86 | +SMF.Data.PixelSize = 0.1; % micrometers, default 0.1 |
| 87 | +``` |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +**Reality:** |
| 90 | +- **Any value works** for pixel-space analysis |
| 91 | +- **Must be accurate** for physical units |
| 92 | +- **Required for calibration** (camera µm to physical µm) |
| 93 | +- **Affects clustering** if distance-based |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +**Better documentation:** |
| 96 | +```matlab |
| 97 | +SMF.Data.PixelSize = 0.1; % micrometers per pixel |
| 98 | +% |
| 99 | +% Common values: |
| 100 | +% - 100nm pixel, 100x objective, no magnifier: 0.1 µm |
| 101 | +% - 16µm pixel, 100x, 1.6x magnifier: 0.1 µm |
| 102 | +% - 6.5µm pixel, 60x: 0.108 µm |
| 103 | +% |
| 104 | +% Used for: |
| 105 | +% - Converting pixel coordinates to physical units |
| 106 | +% - Drift correction distance thresholds |
| 107 | +% - Clustering distance parameters |
| 108 | +% - Physical diffusion coefficients |
| 109 | +% |
| 110 | +% If incorrect: |
| 111 | +% - Wrong physical scale (everything scaled incorrectly) |
| 112 | +% - Drift correction may fail (wrong search radius) |
| 113 | +% - Clustering may under/over-connect |
| 114 | +``` |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +## General Pattern |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +### When a field is context-dependent: |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +1. **Don't just say "optional"** - Specify contexts |
| 121 | +2. **List when required** - Explicit use cases |
| 122 | +3. **List when optional** - Where defaults work |
| 123 | +4. **Document failure mode** - What happens if missing/wrong |
| 124 | +5. **Provide examples** - Show correct usage in both contexts |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +### Documentation Template |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +```matlab |
| 129 | +SMF.Category.FieldName = <default_value>; % <units> |
| 130 | +% |
| 131 | +% REQUIRED for: |
| 132 | +% - <operation 1> - <why needed> |
| 133 | +% - <operation 2> - <why needed> |
| 134 | +% |
| 135 | +% OPTIONAL for: |
| 136 | +% - <operation A> - <why default works> |
| 137 | +% - <operation B> - <why not needed> |
| 138 | +% |
| 139 | +% DEFAULTS to: |
| 140 | +% <default_value> - <what this means> |
| 141 | +% |
| 142 | +% EXAMPLES: |
| 143 | +% <common value 1> - <use case> |
| 144 | +% <common value 2> - <use case> |
| 145 | +% |
| 146 | +% IMPACT if incorrect: |
| 147 | +% - <consequence 1> |
| 148 | +% - <consequence 2> |
| 149 | +% |
| 150 | +% SEE ALSO: <related fields>, <related docs> |
| 151 | +``` |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +## API Design Implications |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +### Current Issues |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +1. **Silent failures** - Missing field causes downstream error |
| 158 | +2. **Inconsistent validation** - Some functions check, others don't |
| 159 | +3. **Poor error messages** - Index errors instead of "missing DataROI" |
| 160 | +4. **No hints** - Function doesn't tell you what's needed |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +### Improvements to Consider |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +#### Option 1: Validate at function entry |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +```matlab |
| 167 | +function [Model, Data] = gaussBlobImage(SMD, SMF, Bg, Density) |
| 168 | + % Validate required fields |
| 169 | + if isempty(SMF.Data.DataROI) |
| 170 | + error(['gaussBlobImage requires SMF.Data.DataROI to be set.\n' ... |
| 171 | + 'Example: SMF.Data.DataROI = [1, 1, 128, 128];']); |
| 172 | + end |
| 173 | +
|
| 174 | + % ... rest of function |
| 175 | +end |
| 176 | +``` |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +**Pros:** Clear error message, fail fast |
| 179 | +**Cons:** Adds validation code to every function |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +#### Option 2: Separate setup functions |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +```matlab |
| 184 | +% Instead of: |
| 185 | +SMF = smi_core.SingleMoleculeFitting(); |
| 186 | +SMF.Data.DataROI = [1, 1, 128, 128]; |
| 187 | +SMF.Fitting.PSFSigma = 1.3; |
| 188 | +
|
| 189 | +% Provide: |
| 190 | +SMF = smi_core.SingleMoleculeFitting.forImageGeneration(128, 128); |
| 191 | +% Automatically sets DataROI and other required fields |
| 192 | +``` |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +**Pros:** Clearer intent, groups related settings |
| 195 | +**Cons:** More API surface, duplicate code |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | +#### Option 3: Context-aware validation |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +```matlab |
| 200 | +function SMF = validateForContext(SMF, context) |
| 201 | + % context = 'analysis' | 'simulation' | 'image_generation' |
| 202 | +
|
| 203 | + switch context |
| 204 | + case 'image_generation' |
| 205 | + assert(~isempty(SMF.Data.DataROI), ... |
| 206 | + 'DataROI required for image generation'); |
| 207 | + case 'real_data' |
| 208 | + assert(~isempty(SMF.Data.CalibrationFile), ... |
| 209 | + 'Calibration required for real data'); |
| 210 | + % ... etc |
| 211 | + end |
| 212 | +end |
| 213 | +``` |
| 214 | + |
| 215 | +**Pros:** Explicit context checking |
| 216 | +**Cons:** User must remember to call, adds complexity |
| 217 | + |
| 218 | +#### Option 4: Documentation improvements only |
| 219 | + |
| 220 | +Keep API as-is, but improve documentation: |
| 221 | +- Mark fields as "Context-Dependent" |
| 222 | +- Add "Required For" sections |
| 223 | +- Improve error messages where possible |
| 224 | +- Add validation examples to docs |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +**Pros:** No API changes, backward compatible |
| 227 | +**Cons:** Still relies on user reading docs |
| 228 | + |
| 229 | +## Recommended Approach |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | +**Short term** (for v1.3.0 documentation): |
| 232 | +1. Add "Context-Dependent Requirements" section to docs |
| 233 | +2. Mark affected fields explicitly in SMF structure docs |
| 234 | +3. Add validation examples to function docs |
| 235 | +4. Improve error messages where possible (non-breaking) |
| 236 | + |
| 237 | +**Medium term** (v1.4.0): |
| 238 | +5. Add input validation to high-risk functions |
| 239 | +6. Create helper constructors for common contexts |
| 240 | +7. Add warnings for suspicious configurations |
| 241 | +8. Create troubleshooting guide for context errors |
| 242 | + |
| 243 | +**Long term** (v2.0.0): |
| 244 | +9. Consider context-aware SMF variants |
| 245 | +10. Redesign API to make requirements explicit |
| 246 | +11. Add comprehensive validation framework |
| 247 | +12. Breaking changes OK in major version |
| 248 | + |
| 249 | +## Audit Checklist |
| 250 | + |
| 251 | +When reviewing documentation for context-dependent requirements: |
| 252 | + |
| 253 | +- [ ] Field documented with "optional" or "default"? |
| 254 | +- [ ] Check: Is it truly optional in ALL contexts? |
| 255 | +- [ ] List contexts where field is required |
| 256 | +- [ ] List contexts where field is optional |
| 257 | +- [ ] Document what happens if missing when required |
| 258 | +- [ ] Add example code showing correct setup |
| 259 | +- [ ] Check if function validates input (add if not) |
| 260 | +- [ ] Add error message improvement if needed |
| 261 | +- [ ] Cross-reference other docs using same field |
| 262 | +- [ ] Test code examples in both contexts |
| 263 | + |
| 264 | +## Testing Strategy |
| 265 | + |
| 266 | +Create tests that verify context-dependent behavior: |
| 267 | + |
| 268 | +```matlab |
| 269 | +function test_gaussBlobImage_requires_DataROI() |
| 270 | + % This should FAIL with helpful error |
| 271 | + SMF = smi_core.SingleMoleculeFitting(); |
| 272 | + % Deliberately omit DataROI |
| 273 | +
|
| 274 | + SMD = smi_core.SingleMoleculeData.createSMD(); |
| 275 | + SMD.X = [64]; SMD.Y = [64]; |
| 276 | + SMD.Photons = [1000]; SMD.Bg = [5]; |
| 277 | + SMD.PSFSigma = [1.3]; SMD.FrameNum = [1]; |
| 278 | +
|
| 279 | + try |
| 280 | + [~, ~] = smi_sim.GaussBlobs.gaussBlobImage(SMD, SMF); |
| 281 | + error('Should have failed without DataROI'); |
| 282 | + catch ME |
| 283 | + % Check error message is helpful |
| 284 | + assert(contains(ME.message, 'DataROI'), ... |
| 285 | + 'Error should mention DataROI requirement'); |
| 286 | + end |
| 287 | +end |
| 288 | +
|
| 289 | +function test_gaussBlobImage_works_with_DataROI() |
| 290 | + % This should SUCCEED |
| 291 | + SMF = smi_core.SingleMoleculeFitting(); |
| 292 | + SMF.Data.DataROI = [1, 1, 128, 128]; % Required! |
| 293 | +
|
| 294 | + SMD = smi_core.SingleMoleculeData.createSMD(); |
| 295 | + SMD.X = [64]; SMD.Y = [64]; |
| 296 | + SMD.Photons = [1000]; SMD.Bg = [5]; |
| 297 | + SMD.PSFSigma = [1.3]; SMD.FrameNum = [1]; |
| 298 | +
|
| 299 | + [Model, Data] = smi_sim.GaussBlobs.gaussBlobImage(SMD, SMF); |
| 300 | +
|
| 301 | + assert(~isempty(Model), 'Should return model'); |
| 302 | + assert(size(Model, 1) == 128, 'Size from DataROI'); |
| 303 | + assert(size(Model, 2) == 128, 'Size from DataROI'); |
| 304 | +end |
| 305 | +``` |
| 306 | + |
| 307 | +## Summary |
| 308 | + |
| 309 | +**Key Principles:** |
| 310 | + |
| 311 | +1. **Be explicit** - Don't hide requirements in context |
| 312 | +2. **Document both** - When required AND when optional |
| 313 | +3. **Show examples** - Correct usage in both contexts |
| 314 | +4. **Fail helpfully** - Clear error messages |
| 315 | +5. **Test both** - Required context AND optional context |
| 316 | + |
| 317 | +**For LLM Documentation:** |
| 318 | + |
| 319 | +When generating examples: |
| 320 | +- Always check if field is context-dependent |
| 321 | +- Include required setup for the example context |
| 322 | +- Add comments explaining why field is needed |
| 323 | +- Cross-reference to full explanation |
| 324 | +- Test code actually runs in stated context |
| 325 | + |
| 326 | +**For Code Review:** |
| 327 | + |
| 328 | +Red flags: |
| 329 | +- Function assumes field is set without checking |
| 330 | +- Error message doesn't mention missing field |
| 331 | +- Documentation says "optional" without context |
| 332 | +- Example code missing required setup |
| 333 | +- No tests for missing required field |
| 334 | + |
| 335 | +## Related Documents |
| 336 | + |
| 337 | +- `.claude/commands/smite_audit_docs.md` - How to audit for these issues |
| 338 | +- `.claude/commands/smite_validate_llm_docs.md` - Comprehensive validation |
| 339 | +- `doc/llm-guide/core-concepts/smf-structure.md` - SMF field documentation |
| 340 | +- `doc/llm-guide/troubleshooting/common-mistakes.md` - User-facing errors |
| 341 | + |
| 342 | +## Version History |
| 343 | + |
| 344 | +- 2025-10-14: Initial documentation of pattern |
| 345 | +- Future: Update as API changes or more patterns discovered |
0 commit comments