generated from Voyager162/portfolio_2025
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Description
Self Grade
| Component | Grade |
|---|---|
| Component A - Program Code | 0.3 |
| Component B - Video/Live Demo | 0.3 |
| Component C - Personal Project Reference | 0.3 |
| MCQ Reflection | 0.88 |
| Total | 1.78 |
Reviewer: Darsh
- CPT blog followed formatting of the CPT submission to College Board.
- Each snippet of code was correct to what the PPR questions were.
- MCQ blog had good tangibles but could be more specific on skills proficient and deficient.
- Next steps could be more in-depth.
Next Steps
- Make sure to conduct an in-depth analysis of the MCQ skills
- Make sure to follow the steps shown in the College Board handout for the PPR
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels