Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redundancies between Showcase and Competitions #230

Open
tresf opened this issue Jun 1, 2017 · 13 comments
Open

Redundancies between Showcase and Competitions #230

tresf opened this issue Jun 1, 2017 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@tresf
Copy link
Member

tresf commented Jun 1, 2017

Currently, showcase and competitions both list the BoL albums. They have some redundancies.

  • Both have embedded players listing the tracks
  • Both list the albums in descending order
  • Both need to be updated at the end of a competition

There are some differences

  • One uses a soundcloud player; the other uses a bandcamp player
  • Rules are only hosted on Competitions
  • Competition entries are only found on Competition page (the link to ALL of tracks certainly has it's place in showcase too, subjectively speaking).

There are some pro's and cons to each page's format, but I'd like to discuss the possibility of consolidating these... from both a code and UI perspective. Ideas, mockups, etc welcome.

image

@RebeccaDeField
Copy link

RebeccaDeField commented Jun 3, 2017

If we merge these pages, we will have three demographics to cater to:

  • People that are listening to music made with LMMS to determine the quality of the program.
  • People that want to support LMMS by listening and/or purchasing the bol albums.
  • People interested in participating in the contests.

I have had some ideas for the layout of this page floating around in my head, so I created a quick mockup which hope illustrates the concept well enough.

idea

Clicking on any of the album covers would bring users to a page with the embedded player (which should be listed first for those that only want to listen) and all of the information that can be found on the Competitions page for those interested in the details of the competition.

By using the album art with a square ratio the process of updating the website with new contests will be more streamlined. Once the album art is finished, there would be no need to splice a part of the background or to make adjustments for contrast against the titles.

shot-2017-06-02_22-14-00

Both have embedded players listing the tracks

While I think that we should add a link to the soundcloud playlist in the respective bol. page, I suggest using the Bandcamp embedded playlist instead of Soundcloud. The Bandcamp playlist also includes a download button that directs people to bandcamp with a popup to purchase the album. This process is a lot easier for people interested in purchasing the album.

@tresf
Copy link
Member Author

tresf commented Jun 3, 2017

@RebeccaLaVie I like your design and agree with every point (avoid splicing art, thumbnailed design, bandcamp for playback). When you say "bring to a page with", I assume you're ok with the page itself dynamically changes, but uses a hashtag like we use on downloads (e.g. /competitions switches to /competitions#bolv4)

One question I have in general is the name of the consolidated page... Should it be called "Showcase" and then switch to "🏆 Competitions" only when an active competition is happening or would a new title be better?

@Spekular
Copy link
Member

Spekular commented Jun 3, 2017 via email

@tresf
Copy link
Member Author

tresf commented Jun 4, 2017

I like the idea of a header showing up on top of our page when an active competition is happening. We should be able to schedule it with some trivial logic. Perhaps a non-TLDR implementation of this:

image

@RebeccaDeField
Copy link

RebeccaDeField commented Jun 4, 2017

I wonder if we could just use Best of LMMS for the title of the page?

When you say "bring to a page with", I assume you're ok with the page itself dynamically changes.

Yep 👍

I also like Spekular's header announcement idea, as long is it is implemented in a way that is not too busy. Or perhaps it can be placed under the entire header section, but still above the fold?

shot-2017-06-04_13-34-48

Just a quick concept, not a final mockup

@Spekular
Copy link
Member

Spekular commented Jun 4, 2017 via email

@tresf
Copy link
Member Author

tresf commented Jun 4, 2017

Sure, but we must be careful not to be overly cosmetic. This is an intentional eye-sore. If it blends in too well, it'll lose its purpose.

Also, the jumbotron is only on the home page. We'd want it on all possible landing pages and dismiss-able, stashed in a cookie.

@RebeccaDeField
Copy link

RebeccaDeField commented Jun 4, 2017

if the color is going to be that muted?

Could be any color. The gray was just as an example.

Also, the jumbotron is only on the home page.

If we want the announcement on every page of the website, you're right, that idea will not work. I have no problems with placing it above the header and I agree that we want to make it stand out. My concern was based more in clear hierarchy than aesthetic, but there are other ways to accomplish that without placing it further down on the page. 👍

@RebeccaDeField
Copy link

@Umcaruje I believe this is related to your efforts here #192

@Umcaruje
Copy link
Member

Ah, thanks, I'll look into combining these two pages in the following days. The only concern I have is that 'Showcase' would attract more people than 'Competitions' but 'Competitions' is more accurate for the name of the page.

@tresf
Copy link
Member Author

tresf commented Oct 17, 2017

@Umcaruje what if we call it "competitions" during promotion and "showcase" in the off-season?

@tresf
Copy link
Member Author

tresf commented Apr 14, 2018

This didn't make the rewrite, so I'm closing it. We'll keep the redundancies for now.

@tresf tresf closed this as completed Apr 14, 2018
@Umcaruje
Copy link
Member

I still plan on tackling this when i have time so I’ll reopen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants