|
| 1 | +import assert from "node:assert/strict"; |
| 2 | +import { test } from "node:test"; |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +import { scoreBacktest, type BacktestCase } from "../dist/index.js"; |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +function corpusCase(targetKey: string, label: BacktestCase["label"], overrides: Partial<BacktestCase> = {}): BacktestCase { |
| 7 | + return { |
| 8 | + ruleId: "missing_linked_issue", |
| 9 | + targetKey, |
| 10 | + outcome: "block", |
| 11 | + label, |
| 12 | + firedAt: "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z", |
| 13 | + decidedAt: "2026-07-22T01:00:00.000Z", |
| 14 | + ...overrides, |
| 15 | + }; |
| 16 | +} |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +test("barrel: the public entrypoint re-exports the backtest scorer (#8085)", () => { |
| 19 | + assert.equal(typeof scoreBacktest, "function"); |
| 20 | +}); |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +test("scoreBacktest: an all-correct classifier scores precision 1 and recall 1", () => { |
| 23 | + const cases = [ |
| 24 | + corpusCase("a#1", "reversed"), |
| 25 | + corpusCase("a#2", "confirmed"), |
| 26 | + corpusCase("a#3", "reversed"), |
| 27 | + ]; |
| 28 | + const report = scoreBacktest("missing_linked_issue", cases, (backtestCase) => backtestCase.label); |
| 29 | + assert.deepEqual(report, { |
| 30 | + ruleId: "missing_linked_issue", |
| 31 | + caseCount: 3, |
| 32 | + truePositive: 2, |
| 33 | + falsePositive: 0, |
| 34 | + trueNegative: 1, |
| 35 | + falseNegative: 0, |
| 36 | + precision: 1, |
| 37 | + recall: 1, |
| 38 | + }); |
| 39 | +}); |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +test("scoreBacktest: an all-wrong classifier scores precision 0 and recall 0, with the misses in the right cells", () => { |
| 42 | + const cases = [corpusCase("a#1", "reversed"), corpusCase("a#2", "confirmed")]; |
| 43 | + const report = scoreBacktest("missing_linked_issue", cases, (backtestCase) => |
| 44 | + backtestCase.label === "reversed" ? "confirmed" : "reversed", |
| 45 | + ); |
| 46 | + assert.deepEqual(report, { |
| 47 | + ruleId: "missing_linked_issue", |
| 48 | + caseCount: 2, |
| 49 | + truePositive: 0, |
| 50 | + falsePositive: 1, // predicted reversed on the confirmed-labeled case |
| 51 | + trueNegative: 0, |
| 52 | + falseNegative: 1, // predicted confirmed on the reversed-labeled case |
| 53 | + precision: 0, |
| 54 | + recall: 0, |
| 55 | + }); |
| 56 | +}); |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +test("scoreBacktest: a mixed classifier accumulates all four confusion-matrix cells", () => { |
| 59 | + const cases = [ |
| 60 | + corpusCase("a#1", "reversed"), // predicted reversed -> truePositive |
| 61 | + corpusCase("a#2", "confirmed"), // predicted reversed -> falsePositive |
| 62 | + corpusCase("a#3", "confirmed"), // predicted confirmed -> trueNegative |
| 63 | + corpusCase("a#4", "reversed"), // predicted confirmed -> falseNegative |
| 64 | + ]; |
| 65 | + const predictReversedFor = new Set(["a#1", "a#2"]); |
| 66 | + const report = scoreBacktest("missing_linked_issue", cases, (backtestCase) => |
| 67 | + predictReversedFor.has(backtestCase.targetKey) ? "reversed" : "confirmed", |
| 68 | + ); |
| 69 | + assert.deepEqual(report, { |
| 70 | + ruleId: "missing_linked_issue", |
| 71 | + caseCount: 4, |
| 72 | + truePositive: 1, |
| 73 | + falsePositive: 1, |
| 74 | + trueNegative: 1, |
| 75 | + falseNegative: 1, |
| 76 | + precision: 0.5, |
| 77 | + recall: 0.5, |
| 78 | + }); |
| 79 | +}); |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +test("scoreBacktest: an empty corpus reports zero counts with precision AND recall null", () => { |
| 82 | + const report = scoreBacktest("missing_linked_issue", [], () => "reversed"); |
| 83 | + assert.deepEqual(report, { |
| 84 | + ruleId: "missing_linked_issue", |
| 85 | + caseCount: 0, |
| 86 | + truePositive: 0, |
| 87 | + falsePositive: 0, |
| 88 | + trueNegative: 0, |
| 89 | + falseNegative: 0, |
| 90 | + precision: null, |
| 91 | + recall: null, |
| 92 | + }); |
| 93 | +}); |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +test("scoreBacktest: precision is null (not 0) when the classifier never predicts reversed, while recall stays real", () => { |
| 96 | + const report = scoreBacktest("missing_linked_issue", [corpusCase("a#1", "reversed")], () => "confirmed"); |
| 97 | + assert.equal(report.precision, null); // truePositive + falsePositive === 0 |
| 98 | + assert.equal(report.recall, 0); // truePositive / (0 + 1 falseNegative) |
| 99 | +}); |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +test("scoreBacktest: recall is null (not 0) when no case is labeled reversed, while precision stays real", () => { |
| 102 | + const report = scoreBacktest("missing_linked_issue", [corpusCase("a#1", "confirmed")], () => "reversed"); |
| 103 | + assert.equal(report.recall, null); // truePositive + falseNegative === 0 |
| 104 | + assert.equal(report.precision, 0); // truePositive / (0 + 1 falsePositive) |
| 105 | +}); |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +test("scoreBacktest: cases for a different ruleId are excluded from every count, caseCount included", () => { |
| 108 | + const report = scoreBacktest( |
| 109 | + "missing_linked_issue", |
| 110 | + [corpusCase("a#1", "reversed", { ruleId: "other_rule" }), corpusCase("a#2", "reversed")], |
| 111 | + () => "reversed", |
| 112 | + ); |
| 113 | + assert.deepEqual(report, { |
| 114 | + ruleId: "missing_linked_issue", |
| 115 | + caseCount: 1, |
| 116 | + truePositive: 1, |
| 117 | + falsePositive: 0, |
| 118 | + trueNegative: 0, |
| 119 | + falseNegative: 0, |
| 120 | + precision: 1, |
| 121 | + recall: 1, |
| 122 | + }); |
| 123 | +}); |
0 commit comments