Hi all,
I am trying to better understand the example discussed in this issue:
#174
In the heavy-duty EV market share constraint example, the following parameterization is used:
<period year="2045">
<minicam-energy-input name="HDV-EV_New_Reg24-2045">
<adjusted-coef year="2045">830</adjusted-coef>
<price-unit-conversion>1.0e-3</price-unit-conversion>
</minicam-energy-input>
<res-secondary-output name="HDV-EV_New_Reg24-2045">
<output-ratio>7.377622377622378E-7</output-ratio>
<pMultiplier>1.0e6</pMultiplier>
</res-secondary-output>
</period>
Could someone explain how the output-ratio value 7.377622377622378E-7 was derived?
How should I calculate the corresponding output-ratio for other vehicle classes or transportation modes when implementing similar EV / ZEV sales-share constraints?
Any guidance would be very helpful.
Thanks!
Hi all,
I am trying to better understand the example discussed in this issue:
#174
In the heavy-duty EV market share constraint example, the following parameterization is used: