Skip to content

Bad NS character set 356Q in Classic and Modern ? #1408

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
rmkaplan opened this issue Nov 11, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Bad NS character set 356Q in Classic and Modern ? #1408

rmkaplan opened this issue Nov 11, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@rmkaplan
Copy link
Contributor

I've been looking at the character mappings from Alto fonts to NS fonts. (Some of the entries in the mapping arrays in Interpress don't seem to be correct.)

It appears to me that character set 356Q (Technical Symbol 2) is completely empty at least in size 10 and 12, whereas 357Q is at least spotted with a few characters.

lf someone confirms that this is the case, do we have another source for these bitmaps?

@masinter
Copy link
Member

In the Google shared drive CHM-PARC
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/0ACzQNpmgRX8_Uk9PVA

there is a folder called "fonts". I'm filling it with all the .DISPLAYFONT files (case insensitive) from the CHM PARC archives.

@masinter
Copy link
Member

there are also .strike files there, and .ac isn't hard to find.

We had some ambitions for better fonts #351

@phantomics
Copy link

I wrote some prototype code for reading BDF font files. The next step is to tie it into Medley's font display system.

@MattHeffron
Copy link
Contributor

I converted Andrew's code to a Medley file, in the package "BDF". I did not make significant changes to the code.
I also have a more complete .bdf file for testing.
Both are attached. (Remove .txt extensions that GitHub required in order to attach.)
READ-BDF.txt
13x34amc.bdf.txt

And, here's the link to the Adobe Glyph Bitmap Distribution Format document

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants