Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

General orientation #1

Open
krassowski opened this issue Oct 4, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

General orientation #1

krassowski opened this issue Oct 4, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@krassowski
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi everyone, thank you for contributing to this eLife Sprint. Briefly, the idea of this project is to make it easier to interactively search and explore existing repositories with scientific code which are extensions of publications. I will be opening a few issues to enable everyone joining to pick up a small task to get started. Please feel very welcome to share your thoughts on the ideas proposed, including both the technical detains and the design goals itself.

For now, it might make sense to limit the scope to public repositories hosted on GitHub or GitLab, but certainly other git-based services can be incorporated later.

@mstimberg
Copy link

Just a general thought: I think what could be an interesting angle specific to academic papers is to focus on the figures as the scientific output. I.e., the main task of the tool would be to figure out what figures of the paper can be recreated using the repository and how. It would also be cool to not only take into account the code itself but also additional information that might be present in a README file, or even in the publication itself.

@krassowski
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Great idea! Going a little bit further I would say that the supplementary files are oftentimes as important; I find that these can serve as a good bridge between paper and repository too.

Of course not everyone commits figure-generating code and a code to export the supplements but if we can encourage it by creating a tool which builds on an assumption of those being present, that would be a small stride in the right direction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants