You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is an update to the recipe approved in #80. The update was requested as it was felt the recipe allowed too many options for the SVG which would make it difficult to implement. The update tries to put some bounds on the type of SVG that a client would support. You can see the specific changes to the recipe in this diff:
We welcome comments on the recipe and as well as voting +1, confused face or -1 feel free to add comments to this issue. If this issue is approved then the author will take account of the comments before we merge the branch in to the master cookbook branch.
If the recipe is rejected by the TRC then we will make the changes requested and resubmit it to a future TRC meeting. If you feel that your comments are substantial enough that the recipe should be looked at again by the TRC after the changes have been made please vote -1 (thumbs down). A confused face is treated as abstaining.
Changes to the recipe will only be made after the TRC voting process has concluded.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(Yikes! I see that manifest highlighting was not in the original and still isn't in this one. Noting here that I'll add it to bring forward visually the JSON specific to an SVG Annotation.)
Links
Background and Summary
This is an update to the recipe approved in #80. The update was requested as it was felt the recipe allowed too many options for the SVG which would make it difficult to implement. The update tries to put some bounds on the type of SVG that a client would support. You can see the specific changes to the recipe in this diff:
https://github.com/IIIF/cookbook-recipes/pull/321/files
Voting and changes
We welcome comments on the recipe and as well as voting +1, confused face or -1 feel free to add comments to this issue. If this issue is approved then the author will take account of the comments before we merge the branch in to the master cookbook branch.
If the recipe is rejected by the TRC then we will make the changes requested and resubmit it to a future TRC meeting. If you feel that your comments are substantial enough that the recipe should be looked at again by the TRC after the changes have been made please vote -1 (thumbs down). A confused face is treated as abstaining.
Changes to the recipe will only be made after the TRC voting process has concluded.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: