-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
parsec_matrix_define_triangle swaps Upper/Lower Triangular matrices? #271
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
documentationImprovements or additions to documentationImprovements or additions to documentation
Milestone
Description
Original report by Omri Mor (Bitbucket: omrimor2, GitHub: omor1).
diag = /* 0 if includes diagonal, 1 otherwise */
if (uplo == matrix_Upper) {
nmax = n-diag;
for (i = diag; i < n; i++) {
unsigned int mm = i + 1 - diag;
blocklens[i] = mm < m ? mm : m;
indices[i] = i * ld;
}
} else if (uplo == matrix_Lower) {
nmax = n >= (m-diag) ? m-diag : n;
for (i = 0; i < nmax; i++) {
blocklens[i] = m - i - diag;
indices[i] = i * ld + i + diag;
}
diag = 0;
}
parsec_type_create_indexed(nmax, blocklens+diag, indices+diag, oldtype, &tmp);Unless I’m misreading this or fundamentally misunderstanding how PaRSEC treats upper and lower triangular matrices, the definitions of the two here are swapped. An upper triangular matrix should have min(n, m) rows, with the first row having m elements, the next having m-1, and so forth, until the last row has 1 element. A lower triangular matrix has n rows, with the first have 1 element, the following 2, and so forth, until it caps at min(n, m) elements.
Unless PaRSEC uses column-major storage order, in which case n is the number of columns, rather than rows, as I’d understood it?
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
documentationImprovements or additions to documentationImprovements or additions to documentation