We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sometimes you want to use the operator to simply run a statement, such as create statement where there are no parameters. However, the input port is required, so it means you have to create a Beacon to send in dummy data just to run the operator, just like in this example: https://github.com/IBMStreams/streamsx.jdbc/blob/develop/samples/JDBCSample/com.ibm.streamsx.jdbc.sample.jdbcrun/JDBCRunSample.spl#L63
Could we change the operator model so that the input ports are all optional? This would make the operator can be more user friendly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not possible to change the operator model to have two optional input ports. JDBCRun has one mandatory and one control port (optional).
Alternative solution: Create a new operator JDBCRunSingleStatement or JDBCSource without any input port, works like source operator.
JDBCRunSingleStatement
JDBCSource
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Sometimes you want to use the operator to simply run a statement, such as create statement where there are no parameters. However, the input port is required, so it means you have to create a Beacon to send in dummy data just to run the operator, just like in this example: https://github.com/IBMStreams/streamsx.jdbc/blob/develop/samples/JDBCSample/com.ibm.streamsx.jdbc.sample.jdbcrun/JDBCRunSample.spl#L63
Could we change the operator model so that the input ports are all optional? This would make the operator can be more user friendly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: