You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be helpful to be able to represent via a pattern that certain sub-terms may only be constants or instances of Symbolics. These assertions would likely appear in Variables (or as a new type of variable).
Constant patterns would eliminate the need for the specialized DiffRule (and allow the input pattern of EvalRule to be described precisely).
Symbolic patterns may be useful as a means of specifying that an argument must be a symbol in order for a term to make logical sense (e.g. index variable for sums/products, infinitesimal terms dx in derivatives/integrals, etc.).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be helpful to be able to represent via a pattern that certain sub-terms may only be constants or instances of
Symbolic
s. These assertions would likely appear inVariable
s (or as a new type of variable).DiffRule
(and allow the input pattern ofEvalRule
to be described precisely).Symbolic
patterns may be useful as a means of specifying that an argument must be a symbol in order for a term to make logical sense (e.g. index variable for sums/products, infinitesimal termsdx
in derivatives/integrals, etc.).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: