-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adding new google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule resource #11709
adding new google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule resource #11709
Conversation
Hello! I am a robot. Tests will require approval from a repository maintainer to run. @slevenick, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look. You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally. |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: resource "google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule" "primary" {
allow_stale_reviews = # value needed
disabled = # value needed
etag = # value needed
}
Resource: resource "google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule_iam_binding" "primary" {
branch_rule_id = # value needed
condition {
description = # value needed
expression = # value needed
title = # value needed
}
location = # value needed
members = # value needed
repository_id = # value needed
role = # value needed
}
Resource: resource "google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule_iam_member" "primary" {
branch_rule_id = # value needed
condition {
description = # value needed
expression = # value needed
title = # value needed
}
location = # value needed
member = # value needed
repository_id = # value needed
role = # value needed
}
Resource: resource "google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule_iam_policy" "primary" {
branch_rule_id = # value needed
location = # value needed
policy_data = # value needed
repository_id = # value needed
}
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 18 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 5 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: resource "google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule" "primary" {
allow_stale_reviews = # value needed
disabled = # value needed
etag = # value needed
}
Resource: resource "google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule_iam_binding" "primary" {
branch_rule_id = # value needed
condition {
description = # value needed
expression = # value needed
title = # value needed
}
location = # value needed
members = # value needed
repository_id = # value needed
role = # value needed
}
Resource: resource "google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule_iam_member" "primary" {
branch_rule_id = # value needed
condition {
description = # value needed
expression = # value needed
title = # value needed
}
location = # value needed
member = # value needed
repository_id = # value needed
role = # value needed
}
Resource: resource "google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule_iam_policy" "primary" {
branch_rule_id = # value needed
location = # value needed
policy_data = # value needed
repository_id = # value needed
}
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 18 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 5 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
@slevenick This PR has been waiting for review for 3 weekdays. Please take a look! Use the label |
mmv1/templates/terraform/examples/secure_source_manager_branch_rule_basic.tf.erb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
mmv1/templates/terraform/examples/secure_source_manager_branch_rule_with_fields.tf.erb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: resource "google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule" "primary" {
allow_stale_reviews = # value needed
disabled = # value needed
etag = # value needed
}
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 15 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test failing with
resource_secure_source_manager_branch_rule_generated_test.go:41: Resource specified by ResourceName couldn't be found: google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule.
mmv1/templates/terraform/examples/secure_source_manager_branch_rule_with_fields.tf.erb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 15 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 15 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 15 Click here to see the affected service packages
View the build log |
Tests are all passing. |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 16 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 16 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode: 🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. |
@slevenick Do you have any ideas why this test is unable to find the branch rule after creation at the update step? Is it related to the lifecycle of resources in acceptance tests, and what changes do you recommend to improve this test setup? |
@slevenick This PR has been waiting for review for 3 weekdays. Please take a look! Use the label |
…add repo and instance resource to the update test config
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 16 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
@GoogleCloudPlatform/terraform-team @slevenick This PR has been waiting for review for 1 week. Please take a look! Use the label |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 16 Click here to see the affected service packages
🟢 All tests passed! View the build log |
…loudPlatform#11709) Co-authored-by: Zhenhua Li <[email protected]>
…loudPlatform#11709) Co-authored-by: Zhenhua Li <[email protected]>
…loudPlatform#11709) Co-authored-by: Zhenhua Li <[email protected]>
…loudPlatform#11709) Co-authored-by: Zhenhua Li <[email protected]>
…loudPlatform#11709) Co-authored-by: Zhenhua Li <[email protected]>
…loudPlatform#11709) Co-authored-by: Zhenhua Li <[email protected]>
…loudPlatform#11709) Co-authored-by: Zhenhua Li <[email protected]>
Adds a new
google_secure_source_manager_branch_rule
resource with tests.Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)