Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No data after October 2019? #584

Closed
domenic opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 9 comments
Closed

No data after October 2019? #584

domenic opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@domenic
Copy link

domenic commented Apr 30, 2020

https://web-confluence.appspot.com/#!/confluence stops at October 2019, listing e.g. Chrome 78 as the latest version. Has something broken?

@stephenmcgruer
Copy link
Collaborator

Unfortunately data collection for confluence is currently scripted-but-manual (see e.g. mdittmer/web-apis#93 and #503), and usage of this project has been low enough historically that (a) updates fall very far behind, and (b) it has not been deemed worth it to automate updating (and then maintain the automation, which is the larger cost).

Can I ask what your use case is? I'm generally interested in what people are trying to use confluence for, as we're looking at potentially sunsetting it this year and I want to understand what might be lost.

@domenic
Copy link
Author

domenic commented May 4, 2020

There has recently been some Twitter kerfuffles claiming that browser X is shipping first, ahead of Candidate Recommendation or such, and that this is an unprecedented break in tradition. I find Confluence useful for finding both current and past counterexamples, via the "Browser-Specific" tab (see also #585). That is, it helps make it clear that advancing the web platform via shipping is something everyone does, and has done for a long time.

Concretely, I used that view to generate the following tweets: 1, 2, 3, 4 5.

If #585 was fixed, or especially #482, I would also be able to link people to the relevant pages directly.

@othermaciej
Copy link

I would find fresher data useful for purposes of finding areas where WebKit might be behind on features, in a way that's easier to analyze than WPT results (which are much more fine grained and often hard to interpret).

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented May 25, 2020

I tried to collect data from Safari 13.1 and unfortunately managed to crash Safari, filed mdittmer/web-apis#94 about that. I've sent mdittmer/web-apis#95 with the data I collected for Chrome and Firefox, but that not as useful without Safari data too.

@stephenmcgruer what do you think we should do?

@stephenmcgruer
Copy link
Collaborator

Apologies for the delay here. I've been wondering if many of the insights desired here could be replaced by MDN's browser-compat-data project, if the data there was of higher quality. Currently it is missing quite a lot of data (see an exploration I did recently), but we're hoping to invest in improving that data this year (we think it has a positive knock-on effect for interop via its use in MDN, visual studio, etc).

What I don't know yet is the diff between the data in BCD and the data here (maybe again there's an opportunity to auto-fill some BCD data using confluence?)

https://mdn-compat-data-explorer.herokuapp.com/ can be enlightening, although it's currently based on an older version of the BCD dataset.

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Jul 16, 2020

I gave it another try to collect data using Safari 13.1.1, hoping that maybe the crash fix was in a patch release, but it still crashes.

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Aug 18, 2020

I tried again on 13.1.2, still crashes.

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Sep 17, 2020

Safari 14 was released today and I was able to collect new data: mdittmer/web-apis#99

Working on updating Confluence now.

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Sep 17, 2020

Alright, https://web-confluence.appspot.com/ has been updated, check it out!

@foolip foolip closed this as completed Sep 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants