Welcome to the official QD-RSA cryptanalysis challenge. This pinned issue invites cryptographers, security researchers, and quantum computing experts to rigorously analyze and test the QD-RSA v1.1 system.
We challenge the community to find any cryptographic weakness, inversion strategy, or implementation flaw in any of the following layers:
Φₛ(x) = x · sin((π + εₛ) · x) mod n
- Can it be approximated or reversed without knowing εₛ?
- Are FFT or lattice-based inversion strategies effective?
Ξₛ(x) = (x + r)² · cosh(γ(x + r)) · tan⁻¹(δ(x + r)) mod n
- Can symbolic regression, surrogate modeling, or QML defeat this layer?
𝓘ₛ*(x) = SHA3-256 ( ∑ xᵏ / bᵏ for k = 1 to Nₛ )
- Can Grover-enhanced attacks recover x or forge a preimage?
- Is symbolic structure leaking through the hash?
Please provide:
- A description of your method
- Code, proof sketch, or attack path
- Runtime estimates or complexity bounds
- Any limitations or assumptions
- Fork this repo to submit alternate branches or experiments.
- Tag all reports with
cryptanalysis. - Discussion, reproducibility, and respectful collaboration are encouraged.
- Credited contributions will be featured in future versions.
- Cryptanalysis Challenge Brief (PDF)
- Version Declaration v1.1
- Reference Implementation (Python, C, C#)
For confidential disclosures: validation@kapodistrian.academy