You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we released v2.56, it was ok to keep 2 as the major version number, since the API was identical to the previous one. A handful of bugfixes were made, but things remained retro-compatible.
That's not the case with v2.58 anymore. As our feature planning table shows, several changes have been made to the API: classes were moved, method signatures were changed, new (complex) features were added, etc.
I think we should bump Flixel Community version to 3.0. This simple change will make it clear to any developer that things have changed significantly. Sticking with 2.5x will cause confusion and frustration for developers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When we released
v2.56
, it was ok to keep2
as the major version number, since the API was identical to the previous one. A handful of bugfixes were made, but things remained retro-compatible.That's not the case with
v2.58
anymore. As our feature planning table shows, several changes have been made to the API: classes were moved, method signatures were changed, new (complex) features were added, etc.I think we should bump Flixel Community version to
3.0
. This simple change will make it clear to any developer that things have changed significantly. Sticking with2.5x
will cause confusion and frustration for developers.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: