Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Dict validations #23

Open
dinispeixoto opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Add Dict validations #23

dinispeixoto opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
Beeing-discussed Not completed issued that requires additional information enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dinispeixoto
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@dinispeixoto dinispeixoto added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 21, 2021
@claudiocn claudiocn added the Beeing-discussed Not completed issued that requires additional information label Apr 23, 2021
@claudiocn claudiocn changed the title WIP: Add Dict validations Add Dict validations Apr 23, 2021
@maurobaraldi
Copy link

I started to look at this feature and use the lists validation as a reference. I've listed the following validations for dictionaries.

  • is_not_empty
  • has_length_lower
  • has_length_greater
  • has_length_equals
  • contains_key
  • contains_value
  • all_values_of_same_type
  • all_values_of_type

What do you think about this items?

@tiagogandarezff
Copy link
Contributor

I started to look at this feature and use the lists validation as a reference. I've listed the following validations for dictionaries.

  • is_not_empty
  • has_length_lower
  • has_length_greater
  • has_length_equals
  • contains_key
  • contains_value
  • all_values_of_same_type
  • all_values_of_type

What do you think about this items?

They seem good. Those follow what it's planned for this project. Thanks for the input.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Beeing-discussed Not completed issued that requires additional information enhancement New feature or request
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants