Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FRR 10.2 upgrade - lost static routes and bgp graceful-restart #17537

Open
2 tasks done
SwimGeek opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 7 comments
Open
2 tasks done

FRR 10.2 upgrade - lost static routes and bgp graceful-restart #17537

SwimGeek opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 7 comments
Labels
triage Needs further investigation

Comments

@SwimGeek
Copy link

Description

In the process of upgrading from FRR 10.1.1 to 10.2 I noticed frr.conf had lost all the static routes in the config (v4 and v6). I did a diff on the old and new config files and found a few other missing items.

  • static routes missing
  • bgp neighbor graceful-restart - removed from IBGP configs
  • settings removed from a vlan interface
    - ipv6 nd adv-interval-option
    - ipv6 nd managed-config-flag

Version

FRRouting 10.2 (cpt-ter-rs1) on Linux(6.1.44-atomic).
Debian 12

How to reproduce

I upgraded a router, restarted FRR, then ran vtysh - then write mem - with the idea to update the config file with new FRR version number. Somewhere in this process I ended up without static routes in the newly written config file.

Expected behavior

Keep the configured static routes after an upgrade.

Actual behavior

frr.conf changed, losing static routes

Additional context

No response

Checklist

  • I have searched the open issues for this bug.
  • I have not included sensitive information in this report.
@SwimGeek SwimGeek added the triage Needs further investigation label Nov 29, 2024
@ton31337
Copy link
Member

Could you show the configs before/after?

@SwimGeek
Copy link
Author

Hi

Here is the diff, from backup the day before.

diff -w /root/host-cpt-ter-rs1-frr.conf frr.conf ⏎

1c1
< frr version 10.1.1

frr version 10.2
114,120c114,118
< interface br0.20
< vrrp 1
< vrrp 1 ip 102.216.76.33
< vrrp 1 ipv6 2c0f:ef18:0:2::33
< vrrp 2
< vrrp 2 ip 102.135.240.33
< vrrp 2 ipv6 2c0f:ef18:0:2::1


interface vlan328
ipv6 nd other-config-flag
ipv6 nd prefix 2c0f:ef18:8001::/64 off-link no-autoconfig
ipv6 nd ra-interval 10
no ipv6 nd suppress-ra
154,169c152,158
< interface vlan300
< ipv6 nd adv-interval-option
< ipv6 nd managed-config-flag
< ipv6 nd other-config-flag
< ipv6 nd prefix 2c0f:ef18:8000::/64 off-link no-autoconfig
< ipv6 nd ra-interval 10
< no ipv6 nd suppress-ra
< exit
< !
< interface vlan328
< ipv6 nd adv-interval-option
< ipv6 nd managed-config-flag
< ipv6 nd other-config-flag
< ipv6 nd prefix 2c0f:ef18:8001::/64 off-link no-autoconfig
< ipv6 nd ra-interval 10
< no ipv6 nd suppress-ra


interface br0.20
vrrp 1
vrrp 1 ip 102.216.76.33
vrrp 1 ipv6 2c0f:ef18:0:2::33
vrrp 2
vrrp 2 ip 102.135.240.33
vrrp 2 ipv6 2c0f:ef18:0:2::1
214d202
< neighbor ATOMIC-IBGP-CORE-v4 graceful-restart
220d207
< neighbor ATOMIC-IBGP-CORE-v6 graceful-restart
225d211
< neighbor ATOMIC-IBGP-EDGE-v4 graceful-restart
230d215
< neighbor ATOMIC-IBGP-EDGE-v6 graceful-restart

@SwimGeek
Copy link
Author

I upgraded two other routers, which kept their static routes, but also had the 'neighbor NNN graceful-restart' lines removed.

I looked through the log files, did not find anything useful.

By the time I saved this I already went and pasted back the static routes - had customers complaining.

So 28x 'ip route' and 'ipv6 route' statements not in the diff above. I can't be sure all 28 went missing - but sure about at least 4.

I did the 'write mem' command to create the new config file a few seconds after it started up, so I'm also not sure if that caused the problem, or if it started up without the static routes.

@ton31337
Copy link
Member

Please give us not the diff, but real configs to load them and see a real case.

@SwimGeek
Copy link
Author

Hi, can't really publish customer routing info on a public forum. Can I share the config just with you?

@ton31337
Copy link
Member

Yes, you can send it to me by email or in Slack.

@ton31337
Copy link
Member

ton31337 commented Nov 30, 2024

Thanks. The graceful-restart issue (with peer-groups) is a known regression and it's fixed in stable/10.2, but gonna be released with 10.2.1... Checking yet regarding static routes if this is an issue from the FRR side or not.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
triage Needs further investigation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants