You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Most areas of FAIR, including data models, versioning, licensing and vocabularies are covered in one or more of these indicators. However no indicators talks about (meta)data having unique and persistent identifiers. There should be an indicator for this, probably under F+A.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We aim to use RDA indicators together with FAIRplus indicators. And assumed that unique identifiers will be covered by the RDA indicators. However, since we have more specific forms of many RDA indicators as FAIRplus indicators, repeating RDA ones might be a burden. We can select some of RDA indicators, sucd as unique identifiers and include into our set.
@oyadenizbeyan I'm pretty sure I saw a version of the F+ indicators somewhere that referenced the RDA indicators each F+ indicator extends and how. This would be really helpful to still have this because at this stage, I can't quite see the differences for some of the indicators. When the references to the RDA indicators weren't there anymore, I assumed the cross-referencing was no longer relevant. I will go back over the indicators and flag any where I see too much overlap with RDA.
Most areas of FAIR, including data models, versioning, licensing and vocabularies are covered in one or more of these indicators. However no indicators talks about (meta)data having unique and persistent identifiers. There should be an indicator for this, probably under F+A.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: