Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

F+A03/04: strong overlap #6

Open
daniwelter opened this issue Sep 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

F+A03/04: strong overlap #6

daniwelter opened this issue Sep 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
feedback: indicator Feedback received for FAIRplus indicators

Comments

@daniwelter
Copy link
Collaborator

It is unclear to me what the difference between F+A03 and F+A04 is. If an appropriate community standard is used, this should already define data structure incl types, constraints etc. In light of this, F+A04 seems to be superfluous, as long as F+A03 is updated to clarify that the use of an accepted community standard, if available, is encouraged over the definition of a new in-house standard.

@EvaMart
Copy link

EvaMart commented Sep 22, 2020

I would split them in "subindicators" like F+S08, since they are related. But i would not remove F+A04, beacuse you can fulfill F+A04 without really fulfilling F+A03.

@oyadenizbeyan oyadenizbeyan added the feedback: indicator Feedback received for FAIRplus indicators label Oct 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feedback: indicator Feedback received for FAIRplus indicators
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants