Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Limit&Market Partials #97

Open
LEAL-original opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Feature Request: Limit&Market Partials #97

LEAL-original opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@LEAL-original
Copy link

Outline:
Currently you can only had TP1, 2, etc which implies you already have targets for partials before the trade.
I come to propose further flexibility regarding Trade Management, arguing that it's essential for the trader to be able to get rid of volume as he goes on; sometimes we'll have a fresh level where we'd like to target, but it's important not to neglect the importance of a Partial@Market as well.

Lastly, it comes without saying that we need the input of volume we want to dispose and not only a %value of the current volume we carry on a given trade; this allows for further and exact control over the trade.

This feature already exists on tradingview for a long long time, and while I don't care much about form personally, the content is important.

Why is it important?
Quite simply because natively, it's not convenient or fast at all.

Thank you for your time, reading and considering my idea, as well as for creating/maintaining the project.

@aneesahmedsyed
Copy link

I wanted to suggested like we have TP1 TP2 etc...we should be able to define SL1 SL2 etc to divide the volume but not taking partial partials but rather just define SL1 or SL2 once a level is reached and price exceeds that level to ride the run and keep moving the SL1 SL2 whatever ...and even partial trailing for partial volume...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants