Skip to content

[Feedback] DashVerse: usability for a funder #15

@vuillaut

Description

@vuillaut

Which service are you reviewing?

DashVERSE

1. I think that I would like to use this system frequently

3 — Neutral

2. I found the system unnecessarily complex

4 — Agree

3. I thought the system was easy to use

2 — Disagree

4. I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system

4 — Agree

5. I found the various functions in this system were well integrated

3 — Neutral

6. I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system

3 — Neutral

7. I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly

2 — Disagree

8. I found the system very cumbersome to use

4 — Agree

9. I felt very confident using the system

2 — Disagree

10. I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system

4 — Agree

How well does this tool meet the specific needs of your research community?

3 — Partially

What did you like most about the system?

It looks nice

What aspects need the most improvement?

As a funder, I want to know if the project I funded (or to fund) follows FAIR principles for software.
I need to easily run EVERSE assessments on this software (at the moment I needed to install resqui - too complicated - but I'll focus on DashVerse here).
I could not find the specific software I assessed in the DashVerse and could not identify if it passes the assessments, nor which assessments.

Any other comments or suggestions?

  • A search box to find my software would be nice
  • A clear list of the indicators that have been tested and the result

Your scientific domain or cluster

None

Your role

Policy maker

What is your primary use case?

A funder who needs to assess the software I will fund

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions