What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
During review of gravity waves for CAM-SIMA (#426), @nusbaume wrote:
#426 (comment)
Instead of hard-coding this here, I feel like we would get better runtime configurability if we just read this from the associated ridge topography file (e.g. the nrdg dimension). I realize we don't have any functionality to specifically grab a dimension from a NetCDF file yet (without directly using PIO calls), so I'd say let's just make an issue for it and then tackle it once CAM-SIMA issue #433 has been implemented.
Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
@nusbaume
Will this change (regression test) answers?
No
Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?
Any Software Engineer can do this
What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
During review of gravity waves for CAM-SIMA (#426), @nusbaume wrote:
#426 (comment)
Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
@nusbaume
Will this change (regression test) answers?
No
Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?
Any Software Engineer can do this