You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This paper suggests that normalisation using cell volumes as size factors (instead of library sizes) for data with good segmentation results and scTransform for data with poor segmentation results performs better for spatially resolved data compared to single-cell lognorm from Scanpy.
This is the summary of the considerations the Authors propose:
I was hoping we can add these alternative normalisation methods to panpipes spatial preprocess workflow.
I think the scTransform is already added as norm_hvg_flavour: seurat, but the volume-based normalisation is only available in R.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This paper suggests that normalisation using cell volumes as size factors (instead of library sizes) for data with good segmentation results and scTransform for data with poor segmentation results performs better for spatially resolved data compared to single-cell lognorm from Scanpy.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03303-w
This is the summary of the considerations the Authors propose:
I was hoping we can add these alternative normalisation methods to panpipes spatial
preprocess
workflow.I think the scTransform is already added as
norm_hvg_flavour: seurat
, but the volume-based normalisation is only available in R.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: