Better benchmarks

[DavJCosby]

Right now I've basically got a benchmark for each significant method. For the most part that's been helpful as I'm in a stage where I'd like to see how a change directly affects a method's performance, but later down the road this model doesn't really make sense. The current solution is pretty noise prone, and it takes forever to run the thing.

Instead of like 10-15 benchmarks, there should be 3-5 that each try to push the system to some extreme from a handful of angles. These should be computationally expensive benchmarks that each ask for 100+ frames of unique color generation. While one might focus on mapping techniques, another might make heavier use of angular/directional setters, or filters.

With better benchmarks like these, regressions/improvements should be more distinguishable from the noise.

• quirky_trail
  heavy usage of angle-based draw methods
• raindrops
  heavy usage of distance-based draw methods
• something focusing on filters
  - [ ] something complex that focuses on index/range operations. Maybe 1D conways game of life?