You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was experimenting with small datasets of various meters. In the case of the glyconeus and the iambic dimeter, I used Seneca Medea 75–92 and 849-855 respectively. These verses do not have elisions, which crashes Anceps, as it tries to calculate the frequency of elisions in the given dataset. Maybe you could add a try or a small check for zero in the calculate_frequencies function in analyze.py. The error almost never occurs, and only for elisions of course, but just wanted to let you know :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Dargones,
I was experimenting with small datasets of various meters. In the case of the glyconeus and the iambic dimeter, I used Seneca Medea 75–92 and 849-855 respectively. These verses do not have elisions, which crashes Anceps, as it tries to calculate the frequency of elisions in the given dataset. Maybe you could add a try or a small check for zero in the calculate_frequencies function in analyze.py. The error almost never occurs, and only for elisions of course, but just wanted to let you know :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: