-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Description
This issue is for collecting discussion of the LinkedClaims proposal in the DIF Labs working group
Please refer to
https://github.com/Cooperation-org/LinkedClaims/blob/main/LinkedClaimsRFC.md
and
https://github.com/decentralized-identity/labs/blob/main/proposals/linked_claims/001_proposal.md
In particular the unresolved questions
-
Is there a need for a specific "glue" vocabulary such as http://cooperation.org/credentials/v1/
-
How to resolve the tension between using a human-viewable subject URI versus a hashable signed credential as the subject of a claim? Could there be a content type or query parameter that switches, but in this case how to ensure the two are aligned?
-
Should the canonical identifier of a claim be included in the claim itself?
-
Review each of the MUST, SHOULD and MAY in the RFC for usefulness and testability
-
Can we write tests for being a LinkedClaim without a single canonical vocabulary?
and the largest question -
What would motivate stakeholders to publish LinkedClaims and expose their claims to external validation? Do non-protocol entities see a use for this?